Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart
and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his
own, but they had everything in common. And with great power the apostles were
giving their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace
was upon them all. There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were
owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold
and laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had
need. Thus Joseph, who was also called by the apostles Barnabas (which means
son of encouragement), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a field that belonged
to him and brought the money and laid it at the apostles' feet. (Act 4:32-37)
I think it is difficult in the wake of the sixties to not
have your reading of this passage be a little biased one way or another.
Everyone wants to turn this into a commune, and then begin to criticize modern
Christians on the basis of it. Then on the other side you have people wanting
to ignore this and move on.
I’m not always sure what to make of it one way or another.
But it seems to me we have a little bit of a sketch of the reality that doesn’t
begin to tell the whole story, and yet manages to betray the fact that there is
a large story behind this. One thing is for certain, no one was being shamed
into giving their possessions here, and it is a bad use of the text to shame
others today with such readings. Neither do I think this had anything to do
with misconceptions concerning the immediacy of Christ’s return.
What you had were the apostles preaching the resurrection
and others coming to believe it. This was not without consequences. Some who
came to believe were rich and owned homes and lands. This last year I enjoyed reading “Through the Eye of a
Needle” by Peter Brown, a book that deals with wealth in the Roman world, and
then looks at how the church dealt with wealth mostly in the fourth century and
on. But it opens a person’s eyes to just how different things were in
antiquity. Land owners, a person who owned a house, well they could afford to
do and or believe whatever they wanted. But the rest of the people, even if
they were “free” tended to be dependent on land owners as patrons. And there
was a lot less freedom there. Changing beliefs and adopting a new religion
could cost you your patronage, your job, and livelihood. So preaching the
resurrection preaching Christ and essentially starting a new religion, one that
mandated you leave your old faith behind, would cause scandal and societal
unrest. The new believers were losing their lives for Christ. They were losing
family, jobs, and they were gaining Christ, and a new family. It was a matter
of survival for these new believers that they be one in heart and soul, and it
was a reality that was created by the work of the Holy Spirit. So they were
looking out for each other, as Christians do even today.
I scratch my head when I hear people criticizing “the church”
or churches for not caring etc. I hear people complain about how much a
congregation puts into building a church and how that money could have better
gone to charity etc. It rings hollow to me. The people who spent their money
building a church, well one they provided work for the community when they did
that. That is no small thing by the way. But two, those people give more to
charity, and by charity I don’t mean what they give to the operating budget of
a church, than any other demographic you can point to. The LCMS alone will
often dwarf the Red Cross in relief efforts, and will be working in the places
that need it long after other efforts have left the scene. And when needed they
have door offerings and so on for congregations such as those in Pilger Nebraska
that see their church building enter the land of OZ. And why? Because of the
resurrection.
Here’s the thing. Christians understand the value of life.
Christians value life. And not just their own. One can’t really value one’s own
life without valuing the life of others. That’s the thing. This is what was
turning the Roman world upside down with the preaching of the resurrection, it
meant that God valued your life, that God valued the life of others. He paid
for your life with blood, with his own life. It was worth that much. Who can
put a price on the blood of God? And when God assigns that kind of value to
you, then what does that say about the value of your neighbor for whom Christ
dies. See then, then it’s a bit harder to use and abuse your neighbor, even if
you did purchase him or her at a slave market. And it begins to make you wonder
a bit about this whole notion of being able to purchase a person for a few
hundred dollars when in reality that person was purchased with the blood of
Christ. And the Christian slave is going to have that same attitude towards his
owner. At least we hope. The problem is that sin is still a part of all of
this, and the potential for even a Christian to abuse a fellow Christian is
quite unbelievable. But then that is something that the gospel reveals to us
too. Before the resurrection was preached, no one really thought twice about
it. Sure, love your neighbor as yourself, was something taught in the Old
Testament. And yet apart from the resurrection the story of the good Samaritan
was foolishness. And the love for your neighbor was you trying to earn
salvation. Even today one can catch glimpses of this. It isn’t really love, it
is an effort to use your neighbor. People come up with bare minimums and try to
define who their neighbor is. They try to split hairs with it. And the motive
is wrong and then the whole thing is wrong. It is a failed love. A failed
attempt to fulfill the law. And the people sense it, when your love of self is
the motive. It can only be overcome by the love of Christ in the forgiveness of
sins. Because it was on the cross that the law was finally fulfilled, and
fulfilled for you by one who did not need to do it. He did it for love, because
he loved you. And that inspires a man like Barnabas to sell a field for his
brothers and sisters in Christ, who lost their lives for the sake of him who
gave them his.
No comments:
Post a Comment