24:1 And after five days the high priest Ananias came down
with some elders and a spokesman, one Tertullus. They laid before the governor
their case against Paul. 2 And when he had been summoned, Tertullus began to
accuse him, saying:
“Since through you we enjoy much peace, and since by your
foresight, most excellent Felix, reforms are being made for this nation, 3 in
every way and everywhere we accept this with all gratitude. 4 But, to detain
[1] you no further, I beg you in your kindness to hear us briefly. 5 For we
have found this man a plague, one who stirs up riots among all the Jews
throughout the world and is a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes. 6 He
even tried to profane the temple, but we seized him. [2] 8 By examining him
yourself you will be able to find out from him about everything of which we
accuse him.”
9 The Jews also
joined in the charge, affirming that all these things were so. (Acts 24:1-9
(ESV)
Tertullus, the rhetorician, was a crafty man in arguing the
case before Paul. You can see why they brought him along to speak for them.
Luke is obviously summarizing the points that Tertullus made, but his speech would
not have been endearing to the larger part of the Jewish population. Perhaps,
only from the view of a high priest could such praise be given to Felix, praise
that is not shared by either Josephus or Tacitus, who says that Felix ruled in
the manner fitting a slave.
Tacitus says this because actually Felix was born into
slavery. Claudius the emperor had freed his brother and made him secretary of
finance, and Felix was given a break. He rose up to the rank of governor.
Slavery in the days of Rome was quite a different animal than it was in the
American south. Though, I still think people try to make more of that than
there really is. It wasn’t based on race, and it seems it was much more common
for a slave in Rome to earn his or her freedom. But a slave was still subject
to the master’s whims, and could be tortured mercilessly, even killed. The Old
Testament allows for slavery, but does not command it, and yet tries to temper
some of the abuses of that system so that a slave could go free if they were
abused. The thing is though as in the case of Felix, suffering the inherent
indignity of slavery puts one at a disadvantage when it comes to government.
The abused often become the abusers. Being raised in the want of an impoverished
family makes you susceptible to greed, bribes and so forth. But Felix worked to
squash rebellions and the Sadducees who ruled in the Temple saw this as a good
thing, as they typically looked at the Pharisees and other such sects in much
the same way fundamentalists are viewed today. And all the more reason to
oppress the poor. It wasn’t peace.
I wonder what it was like for Paul to hear the lies and half-truths
spun from the mouth of Tertullus. Rioting and stirring up riots was a capital
offense in Rome. And of course, Paul had been present and numerous riots, even
in a manner the cause of such riots even as happened in the temple, or perhaps
we would say the focus. He had not started any of these riots, and had that
been so he would have long ago been dealt with by the Romans. He preached the
gospel. That was all. He preached the gospel of Jesus Christ who died to
forgive the sins of the world and rose from the dead. He never attacked the
government, rather he admonished people to obey the government, to love their
rulers and pray for them. But it was Jews who started the riots most often,
though there was the issue of silversmiths in Ephesus. He didn’t stir up the
Jews, rather it was the other way around. He himself loved his people profoundly
as can be seen in every one of his epistles.
Jesus weeps for Jerusalem and wishes that they would know
the things which make for peace. It will
not be so. The reforms of Felix so highly praised here by the accusers of Paul,
will become the impetus for the later rebellions leading to the utter
destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, and finally ending with the siege of
Masada. Both Josephus and Tacitus will see this with the hindsight of an
historian. “Peace, Peace” when there is no peace. “ Well this world will know
its wars, and rumors of wars will flourish. Some of them have to be fought too.
But there is a peace to be had amidst all this turmoil and tribulation, amidst
the lies of our accusers and even the truths they tell. And this is the peace
of God that surpasses all understanding. The peace established by Jesus Christ
who reconciled the whole world to him, who forgives our sins.
No comments:
Post a Comment